RFOXiA LogoRFOXiA Club
← Back to DevHub

MultiNav Pro+ BLE at 50km - line of sight only or does it handle terrain?

Susan GonzalezJune 23, 2026
So I've been spec-ing out a project that involves tracking some remote sensor nodes scattered across a pretty hilly rural area - think rolling farmland with some tree lines here and there, elevation changes of maybe 100-200m between the gateway and the farthest nodes. I've been eyeing the MultiNav Pro+ BLE module mostly because of that 50km range claim, but I'm trying to figure out how realistic that number is in non-ideal terrain. Like, is that 50km figure measured line-of-sight over open water or flat ground, or have any of you actually pushed it through terrain with some obstructions in the way?
💬 3 replies👍 0 likes👁 0 views

💬 Want to join this discussion?

Join the Community on RFOXiA Club →

Replies

AdamJune 23, 2026
@Susan Gonzalez good question and honestly one worth being straight about — the 50km figure is the drone-to-drone spec, meaning both modules are airborne and you've eliminated ground reflections and obstructions entirely. For your use case with fixed ground nodes, you're looking at the 5km ground-to-ground rating as a more realistic baseline.
 
That said, rolling farmland with 100-200m elevation changes isn't the worst terrain you could be dealing with — you're not fighting dense urban RF noise or thick forest canopy. The bigger issue is whether your nodes have any meaningful line-of-sight to the gateway, because even a hilltop or elevated mounting point can dramatically change what you actually get in practice. Fresnel zone clearance matters a lot at these frequencies, and a node sitting in a valley depression will behave very differently from one on a ridge.
 
Honestly the most useful thing you could do before committing is mount one node at your farthest planned location and do a quick range test — the module's receiver sensitivity is the real differentiator here, so you might be surprised what it pulls through partial obstructions. If you want to share a rough sketch of the site layout I'm happy to think through placement strategy with you.
Linda JacksonJune 23, 2026
That 50km spec is definitely a best-case LOS number, probably measured over water or flat open ground with good antenna alignment - in your hilly farmland scenario with tree lines you're realistically looking at maybe 20-30% of that depending on how bad the Fresnel zone obstruction gets. I've deployed nodes in similar terrain and found that gateway placement elevation matters way more than people expect, even getting your gateway up an extra 10-15m can make a huge difference in what actually connects reliably.
William TaylorJune 23, 2026
Linda's spot on about gateway elevation being the real lever here - I'd also add that in rolling terrain it's worth actually running the Fresnel zone math for your worst-case link before you commit, because even a single ridgeline that clips zone 1 can tank your link budget way more than the free-space path loss calc suggests. In my experience with similar deployments you end up doing a lot more gateway placement scouting than you'd expect, sometimes moving it 200m laterally makes a bigger diff than going higher.

💬 Want to join this discussion?

Join the Community on RFOXiA Club →