RFOXiA LogoRFOXiA Club
← Back to DevHub

MultiNav Pro+ BLE - does the RF front-end need any external filtering?

Karen TaylorJune 23, 2026
Hey everyone, been working on a tracker build using the MultiNav Pro+ BLE module and I'm trying to figure out how much I need to worry about the RF side of things on my PCB layout. The module claims that 50km range which I assume is heavily dependent on line-of-sight and the RF front-end being in a clean signal environment - but I'm curious whether the front-end already handles its own filtering internally or if I should be adding any external SAW filters or matching components on my board.
💬 4 replies👍 0 likes👁 0 views

💬 Want to join this discussion?

Join the Community on RFOXiA Club →

Replies

AdamJune 23, 2026
@Karen Taylor good question, and yeah your instinct about line-of-sight is correct — that 50km figure is drone-to-drone with both modules elevated, so ground reflections are out of the picture entirely. For ground-to-ground you're looking at closer to 5km, which is still pretty exceptional for BLE.
 
On the RF front-end question: the module already has the external amplifiers and receiver sensitivity optimization built in, so you're not starting from scratch like you would with a raw Nordic or Silicon Labs chip. That said, your PCB layout still matters more than people expect at 2.4GHz — keep your antenna keepout zone clear, avoid copper pours under the antenna section, and make sure your power supply isn't injecting noise into the RF chain. A dirty 3.3V rail will hurt your sensitivity floor regardless of what filtering is on the module itself.
 
If you're in a particularly noisy RF environment (near switching regulators, motors, or other 2.4GHz devices on the same board), a ferrite bead on the power line to the module is cheap insurance. External SAW filtering on the signal path is probably overkill unless you have a specific interferer you're trying to reject — I wouldn't add that complexity without a reason.
 
What's the rest of your board look like? If you've got motors or a switching regulator nearby that changes the answer a bit.
Barbara WilsonJune 23, 2026
The MultiNav Pro+ BLE already has an integrated LNA and front-end filtering built in, so you shouldn't need external SAW filters for most designs - the matching network is handled onboard. That said, if your PCB has any noisy switching regulators or you're running it close to other RF sources, it's worth keeping the antenna keepout clean and maybe throwing a ferrite bead on the power supply line just to be safe. The 50km spec is very much a best-case LOS number so don't chase that too hard on a typical tracker build.
Robert JacksonJune 23, 2026
Agreed with Barbara - the integrated front-end handles most of the heavy lifting, but I'd still pay close attention to your ground plane under the module and make sure you're not routing any high-freq signals near the antenna keepout zone. On one of my earlier builds I had a switching reg a bit too close and it was murdering sensitivity until I poured a solid ground pour between them. Ferrite on the supply line is cheap insurance too, definitely worth the BOM add.
Sarah MartinJune 23, 2026
Both those points are spot on - just want to add that the antenna keepout on the MultiNav Pro+ BLE is pretty generously sized in the datasheet so def respect that boundary on your layout, even if it feels like wasted board space. Had a build where I crept a via just inside the keepout edge and it knocked a few dB off sensitivity in a way that took me ages to track down.

💬 Want to join this discussion?

Join the Community on RFOXiA Club →