RFOXiA LogoRFOXiA Club
← Back to DevHub

MultiNav Pro+ BLE - does the RF front-end need any external matching for 50km?

Thomas BrownJune 23, 2026
Been digging into the MultiNav Pro+ BLE module and I'm trying to understand what's actually going on with the RF front-end to hit that 50km figure. Like, is there an LNA and PA baked into the module already, or is there an expectation that you'll add external components on your PCB? I've worked with other long-range BLE modules before where the datasheet technically shows the max range but assumes you've got a properly matched antenna and maybe an external PA stage - just want to know if the MultiNav Pro+ is truly self-contained in that regard or if I'm going to need to do some RF tuning work.</TITLE>
 
Secondly, what kind of antenna are people actually using with this thing? I'm assuming a chip antenna isn't going to cut it at those distances, so is there a recommended connector/antenna combo that RFOXiA suggests? Or is there an IPEX/U.FL footprint on the module where I can run a coax lead to a proper whip or patch antenna? Trying to plan my enclosure layout and want to make sure I'm not boxing myself into a corner with antenna options.
 
The use case is a remote sensor node that needs to report back to a base station maybe 5-8km away across fairly open terrain - nothing crazy, well within the claimed spec - but I still want to make sure I set it up correctly from the start rather than chasing RF gremlins later. Any experience from people who've actually deployed this outdoors would be super helpful.
💬 3 replies👍 0 likes👁 0 views

💬 Want to join this discussion?

Join the Community on RFOXiA Club →

Replies

AdamJune 23, 2026
@Thomas Brown good questions, and the fact that you're thinking about this before you build rather than after is exactly the right approach.
 
The MultiNav Pro+ is self-contained in the sense that the amplification and receiver sensitivity optimization is handled on the module itself — the external PA and LNA stages are part of the RF design, not something you need to add on your carrier board. That's actually a big part of what separates it from commodity BLE modules where you're essentially working with the bare SoC output. So no, you shouldn't need to add a PA stage or do matching network work on your PCB side.
 
On the antenna question — you're right that a chip antenna isn't the move here. The module has a U.FL connector, so you can run coax to whatever external antenna makes sense for your enclosure. For a ground-level sensor node at 5-8km over open terrain, a simple omnidirectional whip (half-wave or 5/8 wave) will serve you well and is easy to position vertically for maximum horizontal radiation. If your base station is in a fixed location and you want to squeeze more link margin out of the link, a small directional antenna on the base station side while keeping omni on the node side is a solid approach — you get the gain where it matters without complicating the remote node.
 
For your use case specifically — 5-8km, open terrain, fixed node reporting to a base — you're well inside the ground-to-ground spec even with modest antennas, so as long as you keep the antenna clear of the enclosure body and oriented vertically, you should be solid. The main thing people run into in outdoor deployments is antenna orientation drifting (especially if the node is mounted somewhere that can shift) or the antenna being too close to a metal enclosure wall and getting detuned. Keep a few centimeters of clearance and you'll be fine.
Robert RodriguezJune 23, 2026
Honestly from what I've seen in the early hardware docs, the integrated RF front-end on the MultiNav Pro+ already includes an on-chip PA and LNA, so you shouldn't need an external amp stage to hit the rated range - but that 50km figure is absolutely line-of-sight under ideal conditions with a properly matched antenna, so if your PCB layout or antenna matching is sloppy you'll see that number tank hard. I'd ping the RFOXiA team directly to get the actual output power spec and recommended antenna impedance before you finalize your layout, because that's where most people get burned with these modules.
Joseph JacksonJune 23, 2026
Robert's right on the PA/LNA being integrated - I'll just add that the matching network on the antenna port is pretty sensitive on this module, so even if you're using the recommended chip antenna make sure you're not skimping on the PCB keepout zone or you'll eat like 10-15dB easy. That 50km spec also assumes something close to a 0dBi reference antenna in the link budget calcs so if you're using a PCB trace antenna you might want to sanity check your actual gain numbers before promising that range to anyone.

💬 Want to join this discussion?

Join the Community on RFOXiA Club →