RFOXiA LogoRFOXiA Club
← Back to DevHub

MultiNav Pro+ BLE - using it as a pure beacon broadcaster, no central needed?

Jessica ChanJuly 25, 2026
Hey all, working on a deployment where I need a bunch of nodes scattered across a wide area to just periodically broadcast telemetry (GPS coords, sensor readings) and I don't actually need a central device to maintain a persistent connection to each one. The idea is more like - nodes yell their data out into the air on a schedule, and whatever receiver happens to be in range picks it up. Classic beacon/broadcaster setup basically. My question is whether the MultiNav Pro+ BLE is well suited for this or if the RF front-end is really optimized around connected mode and I'd be leaving a lot of performance on the table running it as an advertiser-only node.</TITLE>
 
Specifically wondering if there's any practical range difference between running in connected mode vs. just advertising at high power. Like does the coded PHY long range mode even apply to advertising packets or is that strictly a connected-mode thing in BLE? I've seen conflicting stuff in the BLE spec docs and I honestly can't tell if it depends on the controller implementation or if it's standardized. If the module supports extended advertising (BLE 5.x adv sets) that would kinda solve my problem since you get much longer payloads and coded PHY on adv too.
 
Also if anyone's done something similar with this module I'd love to know what advertising interval you landed on for a decent balance between update frequency and power draw. These nodes are going to be solar + supercap so power budget matters but it's not super tight. More curious about whether the receiver side has any trouble picking up fast-interval adv packets at real distance vs. slower ones. Feels like it should be fine but range changes things in weird ways sometimes.
💬 4 replies👍 0 likes👁 0 views

💬 Want to join this discussion?

Join the Community on RFOXiA Club →

Replies

AdamJuly 25, 2026
@Jessica Chan yeah this is actually a really clean use case for the MultiNav Pro+ — beacon/broadcaster mode is totally valid and you're not leaving much on the table at all.
 
On the coded PHY question: yes, coded PHY absolutely applies to advertising packets in BLE 5.x, it's not just a connected-mode thing. Extended advertising (the BLE 5.0 adv sets you mentioned) is specifically what unlocks coded PHY on the advertising channels, so S8 coding is available for broadcast. The STM32WB07 on this module supports extended advertising, so you're good there — you get the full range benefit without needing a connection. That's the answer to your spec doc confusion: legacy advertising (pre-5.0) is limited to 1M PHY, extended advertising is where coded PHY becomes available for broadcasters.
 
On the practical range question — connected mode vs. advertising — the RF front-end behavior is essentially the same. The PA and LNA are doing their thing regardless of mode, so the link budget doesn't change dramatically. The real difference is that in connected mode you have acknowledgements and retransmission, which gives you reliability, whereas in broadcast you're fire-and-forget. At range, that matters more than people expect because you'll see some packet loss on the receiver side. With solar+supercap power you could afford to send each telemetry packet 2-3 times with a short gap between, which essentially gives you probabilistic reliability without needing a connection at all.
 
For advertising interval — I'd suggest starting around 1-2 seconds for your use case. The receiver side doesn't really struggle with fast-interval packets at range in my experience, but slower intervals are friendlier to the scanner's duty cycle if you're trying to run the receiver lean too. If your telemetry update rate doesn't need to be faster than every few seconds anyway, 1s interval is a nice middle ground. The firmware repo on GitHub should give you a reasonable starting point to work from.
Omar JohnsonJuly 25, 2026
Yeah the MultiNav Pro+ handles this pretty well actually - you can configure it to run in non-connectable undirected advertising mode so it's just blasting packets out with no expectation of a connection being formed. Shove your GPS coords and sensor payload into the manufacturer specific data field in the ad packet and you're basically done, any scanner in range picks it up passively. Just watch your payload size limits and think about your advertising interval vs battery tradeoffs if these nodes are running off cells.
Kelsey LopezJuly 25, 2026
Omar's got it right, and just to add - if you need to squeeze more data than fits in a single ad packet, look into using the scan response packet as overflow space, though of course that requires the receiver to actually send a scan request which breaks the pure passive model. For fully passive reception I've found keeping payloads tight and doing multiple ad events if needed is the cleaner tradeoff for this kind of mesh-ish broadcast topology.
Alicia NicholsJuly 25, 2026
One thing worth flagging if battery life is a concern - the MultiNav Pro+ has a configurable TX power setting and dropping it down from max can meaningfully extend runtime on cells if your receiver density is high enough that you don't need the full range. Also depending on how often your sensors are actually updating, you can gate the ad events so the radio's only active when there's fresh data to push rather than just hammering the air on a fixed interval.

💬 Want to join this discussion?

Join the Community on RFOXiA Club →